Newsletters

947

Tips When Goods Are Damaged or Lost During Transport

Nine things you need to know about claims resulting from transport by truck, as established by the applicable laws and cases. These tips could be helpful whether you are making a claim or defending against one.

  1. The contract of transport binds the parties and constitutes the law which governs them. It is known as a “Bill of Lading” or under the abbreviation “BOL”, also known as a “connaissement” in French. It includes the names of the sender, recipient and carrier, the location and date of the pick-up, points of origin and destination, and a description of the goods, including the quantity, volume or weight.
  2. The carrier has an obligation to transport the property to its destination. It is an obligation of result, from which it can only be released by proving that the damage was caused by a fortuitous event or the inherent defect of the goods.
  3. When a trucking company subcontracts a leg of the transportation to another trucking company, the two companies are jointly and severally liable if a loss occurs: each of them is 100% responsible for the loss and the shipper can file a claim with either or both for the entire amount of the claim.
  4. All claims are subject to an advance written notice to be given to the carrier. This notice must be sent within 60 days from the date of delivery, whether the loss to the property is apparent or not, or nine months from the date of shipment if the property has not reached its destination. Failure to give this notice constitutes a bar for making a claim.
  5. Provided a notice has been duly forwarded to the carrier within the prescribed time frame, a claim is subject to a three-year prescription period from the date the property was or should have been delivered.
  6. If the value of the goods transported is declared on the bill of lading, this value will be the limit of the trucking company’s liability, not only for the damage to the goods, but also for all other consequential damages.
  7. In the absence of a declared value on the bill of lading, the liability of the trucking company is limited to $4.41 per kilo according to a pre-printed clause appearing in most bills of lading.
  8. If liability is limited to $4.41 per kilo, in virtue of such a clause the limit will be set by taking into consideration the total weight of the shipment, even if the loss is only partial. This value represents the trucking company’s maximum liability for all damage, including consequential damages.
  9. A trucking company is not liable for the loss of high-value goods if it carries these goods without knowing their value.

The above are general recommendations. Many factors, such as the mode of transportation or a foreign origin or destination could dictate the application of different rules. Do not hesitate to contact one of our team members for more information.

947

Authors

Normand Laurendeau

Lawyer, Partner

Articles in the same category

New CAI Guidance on Preventing Confidentiality Incidents: A Practical Roadmap for Businesses in Quebec

On January 30, 2026, Quebec’s privacy regulator, the Commission d’accès à l’information (“CAI”), published fresh guidance aimed at strengthening how organizations prevent confidentiality incidents involving personal information. Confidentiality incidents are one of the most significant privacy risks facing organizations today. In Quebec, these incidents are governed by several laws, including the Act respecting the protection […]

Not-So-Latent Defects for a Poorly Equipped Tradesman

In Beaudoin v. Boucher, 2025 QCCA 1646, rendered last December 19, the Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of an action in latent defects brought by the buyers of a residential property. The Court reiterated the buyer’s duty to pursue further inspections when confronted with serious indicia of defects, particularly where they possess recognized expertise […]

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]