Newsletters

190

Does the Pay Equity Act Really Correct the Gender Pay Gap?

The short answer? No.

First, pay equity is different from equal pay. The notion of equal pay means equal pay for equal work, whereas pay equity involves looking for equal pay, but for a different job deemed equivalent.

The purpose of the Pay Equity Act [Act] is to “redress differences in compensation due to the systemic gender discrimination suffered by persons who occupy positions in predominantly female job classes.”[1]

Systemic discrimination is a form of discrimination inherent to the system, that is, an established order stemming from practices that are generally involuntary and seemingly neutral, but which result in wage gaps between jobs traditionally held by men and those held by women.[2]

To achieve pay equity, an employer must analyze, according to various criteria, the predominantly female and male positions within his company only, and then determine their equivalence and correct the wage gaps accordingly. When an enterprise within provincial jurisdiction employs 10 or more employees, it is subject to this obligation[3] and must undertake this analysis within the framework provided by the Act.

Although the Commission des normes, de l’équité, de la santé et de la sécurité du travail provides employers with tools to assist them in this analysis, it is nonetheless subjective, and will not take into account the entire labour market: it will not consider wage differentials from one company to another.

Also, the Act is of no assistance in correcting the socio-economic factors on which the gender pay gap is based. This includes the predominance of women in non-standard jobs and the fact that a majority of women work for smaller companies or in the public sector.

The traditional factors that are at the root of the gender pay gap are education, work experience, the type of profession and unionization. In recent years, women have been more educated, but wages have not increased proportionately.[4]

In 2020, women were earning an average of 92% of men’s wages in Quebec.[5]

For the “education, law and social, community and government services” category, women earned a measly 77% of men’s wages.

For the application of the Act, only the number of people who fall within the definition of employee is considered. For instance, people such as students working during their holidays, interns, the self-employed and senior management officers,[6] cannot benefit from the correction of wage gaps.

It should be noted that in Quebec, the proportion of women in management positions for the year 2020 was 47.3%, while women represented 42.7% of senior management positions.[7] In Canada, women’s representation on boards of directors only ranges from 19.4% to 35.2% depending on the industry.[8]

As a result, women, who hold nearly half of senior management positions, do not benefit from the protection of the Act. Neither do the small percentage of women who manage to break the famous “glass ceiling” and get appointed on a board of directors.

Nevertheless, the Act does help to address certain wage inequities on lower-level positions within a given company. On the other hand, it fails to address issues such as the glass ceiling or salary gaps on higher-level positions. Even with the best will and putting all the necessary hours into it, a woman who climbs the corporate ladder and finally reaches a high-level position still cannot hope for equal pay to this day. This is sufficient to erode her motivation.

May this message be heard.

[1] Pay Equity Act, CQLR c E-12.001, s. 1.

[2] François Robitaille, “L’essentiel de l’équité salariale”, Ordre des conseillers en ressources humaines agréés, 2020, online.

[3] Supra, note 1, s 4.

[4] Aneta Bonikowska, Marie Drolet, Nicole M. Fortin, “Earnings Inequality and the Gender Pay Gap in Canada: The Role of Women’s Under-representation Among Top Earners”, Statistics Canada, released March 7, 2019, <https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-626-x/11-626-x2019002-eng.htm>.

[5] Statistics Canada, Average and median gender wage ratio, annual, table 14-10-0340-02, online.

[6] Supra, note 1, s 8 par (6), and 9.

[7] Statistics Canada, Proportion of women and men employed in management positions, annual, table 14-10-0335-03, online.

[8] Statistics Canada, Representation of men and women on boards of directors, table 33-10-0218-01, online.

190

Articles in the same category

New CAI Guidance on Preventing Confidentiality Incidents: A Practical Roadmap for Businesses in Quebec

On January 30, 2026, Quebec’s privacy regulator, the Commission d’accès à l’information (“CAI”), published fresh guidance aimed at strengthening how organizations prevent confidentiality incidents involving personal information. Confidentiality incidents are one of the most significant privacy risks facing organizations today. In Quebec, these incidents are governed by several laws, including the Act respecting the protection […]

Not-So-Latent Defects for a Poorly Equipped Tradesman

In Beaudoin v. Boucher, 2025 QCCA 1646, rendered last December 19, the Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal of an action in latent defects brought by the buyers of a residential property. The Court reiterated the buyer’s duty to pursue further inspections when confronted with serious indicia of defects, particularly where they possess recognized expertise […]

When Love and Construction Contracts Go Out the Window…

In Gélinas v. LG Constructions TR inc., rendered on October 30, 2025, the Court of Appeal comments on the legal framework governing a contractor unilaterally terminating two construction contracts. In particular, the Court clarifies the application of article 2129 of the Civil Code of Quebec (“C.C.Q.”), which provides, when applicable, that a client is bound […]

Finally Properly Interpreted, the Policy Had a Heart

In a recent decision, Morissette v. BMO Société d’assurance vie, the Superior Court reviewed the principles applicable to the interpretation of insurance policies. Facts In June 2003, the Plaintiff took out a health insurance policy (hereinafter “Policy”) with BMO Société d’assurance vie (hereinafter “BMO”). The Policy provides, among other things, that $150,000 will be paid […]

When the Remedy Becomes the Dispute: Medical Liability Under Scrutiny

In the case N.L. v. Mathieu, 2025 QCCS 517, the Superior Court dismissed a medical liability lawsuit filed by a teacher against her former family doctor, in which she sought over $1.9 million in damages. The plaintiff accused her doctor of having inappropriately prescribed medication over several years, without proper follow-up and without informing her […]

Bill 89 and the Future of Labour Disputes in Quebec

Passed by the National Assembly on May 29, 2025, Bill 89 (An Act to give greater consideration to the needs of the population in the event of a strike or a lock-out, hereinafter the “Bill”) will come into force on November 30, 2025. The Bill, which has faced strong opposition from unions, will bring significant […]